I LIKE footballers but they don’t half tell fibs.
They obey the laws of the game like I stick to the speed limit — when they think someone is watching.
We each draw our own red lines across the game’s rule book. It’s no more than a guideline, a paper for discussion. Last weekend, I saw a Premier League player tugging at his own teammate’s shirt in a bid to fool a referee. They are all cheats.
As fans, we are art lovers in a gallery of rogues. It’s just that some are more lovable than others.
Retired rogues adjourn to television studios to sit in judgment on the laws they routinely broke in their playing days. Every single decision is forensically reviewed in public.
More people registered a vote on Mo Salah’s latest penalty claim than turned out for the last local elections. It’s fair to say he didn’t get a working majority last Saturday.
VAR is still a brand new toy that dad is trying to figure out how to work properly. Until technology can look within the murky minds of professional players, it is guessing at all but the issues that it can draw parallel lines across.
Ex footballers sound off about how referees don’t “know” the game because they’ve never played it. Like you’ve got to do a stretch in E Wing to know you’ve been mugged.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel where we preview, immediately react to and analyse every Liverpool game…
No… Referees know the laws, which is more than most ex footballers do.
The problem with those laws is that they are as vague as the pundits when it comes to defining foul play.
Welcome to Law 12…
“A direct free kick is awarded if a player commits any of the following offences against an opponent in a manner considered by the referee to be careless, reckless or using excessive force…
“Charges, Jumps at, Kicks or attempts to kick, pushes, strikes or attempts to strike, tackles or challenges, trips or attempts to trip.”
You will find no mention whatsoever of “going down too easily” or players “looking for contact” or how late the victim fell to ground. There is nothing that says you can hold an opponent’s arm for a second or two, but no longer. So many of the criteria by which the experts deliver their sage verdicts are clauses of their own making.
A lot of the elder statesmen of the studio panels used to play the game like Monty Python’s Black Knight. If you got the ball, any collateral damage was excusable. They are from the “man up” generation. It was an age when mental health was the stuff of stand-up routines. We’ve moved on, guys.
Football officiating has simply tried to move with the times; to show a duty of care to the most creative and gifted players; to protect them from the “careless”, “reckless” and “excessive”. They are the three words that are ringing in the referees’ heads as they race to the scene of a crime pursued by screaming, gesturing players.
Law 12 offers them some help with loose definitions of the different levels of wrongdoing…
“Careless is when a player shows a lack of attention or consideration when making a challenge or acts without precaution. No disciplinary sanction is needed.
“Reckless is when a player acts with disregard to the danger to, or consequences for, an opponent and must be cautioned.
“Using excessive force is when a player exceeds the necessary use of force and endangers the safety of an opponent and must be sent off.”
In addition, referees are offered advice on players initiating contact and other contemporary tricks of the trade, but their big calls are judgments of character as much as they are judgments of actions. They’ve got to decide who is telling the truth and who isn’t.
They’ve got to decide who is telling the truth among a group of people that all appeal for it to be their throw in every single time the ball goes out of play; a group that earnestly make a round “ball” with their arms a split second after amputating an opponent’s leg; a group that look accusingly at the pristine surface for an imaginary divot after skying a clear chance over the Annie Road roof.
If there is anything more duplicitous than diving, it is accusing someone you’ve just kicked into the air of diving. As a rough guide to those moments, the bigger the indignation, the bigger the guilt.
For what it’s worth, I thought the ref was right to turn down Salah’s claim last weekend but he was given a decision to make because there was an “attempt” to “challenge”. Mamadou Sakho stuck a leg out. The Palace reaction was born more out of relief than rage.
I’m not going to offer any advice to Mo. He can look after himself, but referees are good at their jobs because they take pride in their work. They review their performances and decisions. However independently minded they may be, they are human enough to store the names of anyone they suspect is messing with them or their profession.
Everyone in football is playing the game — not just the players with their innocence pleas, not just the managers who constantly work over the fourth officials, not just the TV jurors with their own agendas — everyone is trying it on except for the only neutrals in the house, the referees and their assistants.
City are apparently putting together a video compilation of all the penalties that Raheem Sterling should have had this season. I’m not sure whether protests of that kind truly help or hinder. Is it better to appear to be a referee that caves into orchestrated pressure or one that stubbornly resists it? We’ll find out next time Raz goes down… Next time Mo goes down.
Salah was awarded three penalties in four games around the turn of the year, by three different referees in three different circumstances. All were justifiable. I’m almost certain they are the only three penalties given for fouls on him so far this season. Interestingly, he’s not currently among the Premier League’s top 20 “most fouled players”.
Salah was guilty of a sad dive at Chelsea last spring and Jürgen Klopp didn’t shirk criticising him for it. At Bournemouth last month, he rode a clear foul en route to scoring the second goal.
The evidence balances in Mo’s favour if anyone cares to look at it properly. He’s just got to keep it that way, that’s all.
For instant reaction to all the Liverpool news and events that matter to you, SUBSCRIBE to TAW Player…
“Salah has gone from a pacey wide man to an out-and-out centre forward in six months, It’s remarkable.” 🇪🇬👑
🗣 Listen to this week’s FREE Anfield Wrap show, after the Reds 4-3 win over Crystal Palace, in full here 👉 https://t.co/DMl2618MR1 pic.twitter.com/WtKtjGAB5m
— The Anfield Wrap (@TheAnfieldWrap) January 21, 2019
Pics: David Rawcliffe-Propaganda Photo
Like The Anfield Wrap on Facebook
A direct free kick is awarded if a player commits any of the following offences against an opponent in a manner considered by the referee to be careless, reckless or using excessive force…
Considered by the referee. the key part of pretty much most laws of the game. Its an opinion, its not black and white and we need to remember that when half the world is agreeing with a call and the other half is losing their shit. Its why we get supposed inconsistencies with these things but they’ve always been there yet we still don’t seem to accept it.
Fair well reasoned argument Clive. None of us neutral except the neutrals and we about the most when we want it more and it means the most.
I often think how the best players, those with all the effort, are often playing on the edge of the law. Sometimes they get it wrong like Salah last week. Sometimes they get it very wrong, Suarez did on several occasions. And sometimes they always seem to be going down like Neymar. These guys are the best because it means so much to them and they try so hard to win. It’s inevitable that occasionally they take it too far.
Just re-read this.. first bit makes no sense at all :)
A fine summary of the modern game… Next week take a look at the ‘why.’… Money and job security presumably causes this win at all costs mindset… And the week after Clive how about a piece on how this cheating mentality trickles down all the way to the under 8s. I’m a dad with a lad and I hate Sunday mornings.
You must have it cushy if you only get to hate mornings only on Sundays… The rest of us hate all mornings.
Well said. It’s a pleasure to read some sensibility amidst all the noise.
Anyone who plays football also knows that sometimes the slightest tug of the shirt or contact on the foot can prevent a clean shot as the trigger is pulled. The dark arts of defending (which never seems to get labelled as ‘cheating’ in the same way) sometimes needs a calibrated movement to ground (ie a dive) to get the right decision – otherwise a ref will say there ‘wasn’t enough in that….’
Who’d be a ref!
Most people from Greater Manchester or South Yorkshire who support a team from Manchester it would appear.
How about changing the terminology of the laws to something like ‘any non-footballing interference attempting to negate the advantages gained by skilful play or disadvantages caused by poor play’.
Did it ever occur to anyone that Salah may “go down late” sometimes because he’s trying to stay upright? He’s no Neymar or Kane, so let’s get it into perspective.
Can we also just add that in all the fouls at least there actually was contact. For non contact then see messers Kane and Ali
You think the EPL Refs are shite
You should watch the A-League – beyond Clueless and they have VAR
I love the fact that Clive wishes to discuss Salah and his going to ground against Palace. Was this the only contentious thing to happen in that game??? It is the one that people wish to discuss the most and not the 2 clear handballs that palace did in their box or the constant fouls on VvD all game. In fact for the majority of the game, Jon Moss gave us nothing.
As for Mo, there was contact. He went to ground but played on. He didn’t appeal. It was Palace who made all the noises.